Administration Meeting Guidelines Rubric
Administration Meeting
Guidelines Rubric
This rubric is designed to guide our meetings, ensuring they are productive, efficient, and aligned with our organizational objectives. It provides a framework for evaluating the effectiveness of our meetings and offers criteria for continuous improvement.
Criteria |
Excellent |
Satisfactory |
Good |
Poor |
---|---|---|---|---|
Agenda Setting |
Agenda circulated >48 hours in advance with clear topics, objectives, and outcomes. |
Agenda circulated 36-48 hours in advance with sufficient detail. |
Agenda circulated <36 hours in advance lacking some details. |
No agenda circulated or circulated too late to be useful. |
Participant Roles |
Roles clearly assigned and communicated well before the meeting. |
Roles assigned with minimal lead time but clear. |
Roles not clearly defined or communicated late. |
Roles not assigned or communicated, leading to confusion. |
Time Management |
Meeting starts/ends on time; agenda items adequately covered within designated times. |
Minor deviations from planned times; all items covered. |
Significant time mismanagement; some items rushed or skipped. |
Meeting poorly timed; agenda not fully covered. |
Participation |
Active and respectful participation from all; diverse viewpoints encouraged. |
Good participation from most; some diversity in viewpoints. |
Limited participation; few viewpoints expressed. |
Poor participation; lack of respect or inclusivity in discussion. |
Decision Making |
Decisions reached by consensus or clear process; all voices considered. |
Most decisions reached by consensus; process occasionally unclear. |
Some attempts at consensus; decision-making process not always followed. |
Decisions made without consensus or clear process; exclusivity in decision-making. |
Action Items |
Clear summary action of items with responsibilities and deadlines provided promptly. |
Action items summarized with minor delays or missing details. |
Action items unclear or delayed significantly. |
No summary of action items or significant delays and inaccuracies. |
Documentation |
Meeting summary distributed within 24 hours; comprehensive and accurate. |
Meeting summary slightly delayed but accurate. |
Meeting summary delayed >24 hours or lacks detail. |
No meeting summary or significantly delayed and inaccurate. |
Effectiveness |
Meeting effectively meets objectives with positive outcomes; evaluated promptly. |
Meeting mostly meets objectives; evaluation shows minor issues. |
Meeting partially meets objectives; effectiveness questioned. |
Meeting does not meet objectives; no effective evaluation conducted. |
Continuous Improvement |
Feedback actively collected, reviewed, and implemented for improvement. |
Feedback collected and reviewed with some implementation. |
Limited feedback collection; minimal review or improvement. |
No feedback collected or reviewed; no improvement efforts. |
This rubric will be reviewed annually to ensure it remains relevant and effective in guiding our meeting practices.