Sample Performance Evaluation
Sample Performance Evaluation
[YOUR COMPANY NAME]
Date: April 12, 2056
Employee Information:
-
Name: [Employee Name]
-
Position: [Employee Position]
-
Department: [Department]
-
Evaluation Period: [Evaluation Period]
Introduction: This evaluation is designed to assess the performance of an employee in their role. It highlights strengths and areas for improvement.
Evaluation Overview: Through a systematic review, this evaluation process aligns individual performance with organizational goals, identifying areas for career development and training needs.
Instructions for Performance Evaluation:
Criteria:
Review the evaluation criteria listed below, which cover various aspects of performance, including job knowledge, quality of work, productivity, teamwork, communication, initiative, and professional development.
Description:
Understand the description provided for each criterion to ensure clarity and understanding of what is being assessed. Each criterion represents a specific aspect of performance that contributes to overall effectiveness in the workplace.
Evaluation:
Job Knowledge: Evaluate the employee's grasp and application of professional knowledge.
Quality of Work: Assess the accuracy, thoroughness, and orderliness of the employee's work.
Productivity: Evaluate the amount of work completed by the employee during the evaluation period.
Team Work: Assess the employee's cooperation, interaction, and coordination with team members.
Communication: Evaluate the effectiveness of the employee's verbal and written communication skills, as well as their listening skills.
Initiative: Assess the employee's ability to self-start tasks, demonstrate assertiveness, and exhibit problem-solving capabilities.
Professional Development: Evaluate the employee's efforts to upgrade professional skills and attendance to training programs.
Rating (1-5):
Assign a numerical rating (1 to 5) to indicate the level of performance for each criterion.
Ensure that the ratings accurately reflect the individual's performance and align with the descriptions provided for each criterion.
Evaluation Table
|
Criteria |
Description |
Evaluation |
Rating (1-5) |
|---|---|---|---|
|
Job Knowledge |
Grasp and application of professional knowledge |
||
|
Quality of Work |
Accuracy, thoroughness, and orderliness of work |
||
|
Productivity |
Amount of work done during the rating period |
||
|
Team Work |
Cooperation, interaction, and coordination with teams |
||
|
Communication |
Verbal, and written communication effectiveness, listening skills |
||
|
Initiative |
Self-started tasks, assertiveness, problem-solving capabilities |
||
|
Professional Development |
Upgrade of professional skills, attendance to training programs |
Notes: Rating scale is from 1-5. 1 signifies Poor Performance; 2 indicates Below Average; 3 stands for Average; 4 denotes Above Average; and 5 implies Outstanding.
Additional Comments and Notes
|
Evaluator's Name |
Date |
Comments |
|---|---|---|
