Guardianship Evaluation

[YOUR COMPANY NAME]

---

Date: [DATE]

Introduction: This form facilitates a comprehensive assessment of individuals' suitability for guardianship duties, ensuring they can responsibly care for the wards under their charge.

Overview: The form outlines key criteria, including physical health, mental capacity, decision-making abilities, and the guardian-ward relationship, to provide insights for informed guardianship decisions.

---

Evaluation Criteria:

Professionals conducting this Guardianship Evaluation should assess the following factors:

1. Physical Health: Evaluate the guardian's overall physical well-being and ability to fulfill caretaking responsibilities effectively.

2. Mental Capacity: Gauge the guardian's cognitive abilities, including decision-making skills and understanding of their duties.

3. Decision-Making Abilities: Assess the guardian's capacity to make responsible choices regarding the welfare and best interests of the ward.

4. Relationship with the Ward: Evaluate the nature and quality of the relationship between the potential guardian and the ward, considering aspects such as trust, communication, and emotional support.

The evaluation process relies heavily on:

• Behavioral Observations: Observe the guardian's interactions and behaviors towards the ward to ascertain their suitability for guardianship.

• Interviews: Engage in structured interviews with the potential guardian to gather insights into their motivations, intentions, and ability to fulfill guardianship duties.

• Review of Relevant Documents: Examine any relevant documentation, such as legal records or personal statements, to corroborate information provided during the evaluation process.

---

Instructions for Guardianship Evaluation:

1. Review Criteria: Examine each criterion listed in the table.

2. Assessment Process: For each criterion:

• Evaluate the guardian's performance based on the description provided.

• Use the rating scale (1 to 5) to indicate the level of achievement or performance.

• Place a checkmark or fill in the corresponding box with the appropriate rating.

3. Checkmark or Rating:

1 - Poor: Performance significantly below expectations.

2 - Fair: Performance slightly below expectations.

3 - Good: Performance meeting standard expectations.

4 - Very Good: Performance slightly above expectations.

5 - Excellent: Performance surpassing expectations.

4. Conclusion: After evaluating each criterion, synthesize your assessments to form an overall evaluation of the potential guardian's suitability.

---

Evaluation Table

Criteria	Description	1	2	3	4	5
Physical Health	Evaluate the guardian's physical ability to take care of the ward
Mental Capacity	Gauge the guardian's mental soundness and ability to make decisions
Decision-Making Abilities	Assess how well the guardian can make responsible choices for the caretaking of the ward
Relationship with the ward	Evaluate the nature and quality of the relationship between the guardian and the ward

Additional Comments and Notes:

Description	Comment/Note
Observations
Conclusion and Recommendations

---

Evaluation Templates @ Template.net