Architecture Performance Appraisal Evaluation

Please take a few moments to thoroughly complete this evaluation. Fill in the sections with details and use the rating scale herein to assess fairly and consistently. Include additional comments as needed.

Employee Information

Field	Information
Name:
Position:
Department:
Evaluation Period:

Evaluator Information

Field	Information
Name:
Position:
Date:

Rating Scale

Rating	Meaning
1	Unsatisfactory: Performance does not meet expectations
2	Needs Improvement: Performance meets some but not all expectations
3	Satisfactory: Performance meets expectations
4	Good: Performance exceeds expectations
5	Excellent: Performance far exceeds expectations

Evaluation

Criteria	Description	Rating
Design Quality	Assess the creativity, functionality, and aesthetics of architectural designs.
Technical Skill	Evaluate the proficiency in using architectural tools and technologies.
Project Management	Evaluate the ability to manage projects effectively, including budgeting, scheduling, and resource allocation.
Client Satisfaction	Measure the satisfaction level of clients and stakeholders.
Team Collaboration	Assess the ability to work effectively within a team.
Communication Skills	Evaluate the clarity and effectiveness in communication with clients, team members, and stakeholders.
Problem-Solving	Assess the ability to identify issues and develop effective solutions.
Innovation	Evaluate the ability to introduce new ideas and methods in architectural design.
Adherence to Regulations	Assess the compliance with relevant codes, standards, and regulations.
Professional Development	Measure the commitment to continuous learning and development in the field of architecture.
Total Score

Additional Comments

No.	Details

Thank you for taking the time to complete this evaluation. Your feedback is valuable in helping us maintain high standards in architectural practice.