Free Architect Criteria Template

Architect Criteria

Introduction

This document provides the architectural criteria developed by [Your Company Name]. The purpose is to establish clear guidelines and standards to ensure the successful design and implementation of architectural projects.

Purpose

The purpose of this Architect Criteria is to:

  • Outline the design and performance expectations for the project.

  • Ensure the design meets the client’s needs and preferences.

  • Maintain consistency with industry standards and regulatory requirements.

Scope

This criteria document covers:

  • Design requirements and objectives

  • Performance and functional standards

  • Material and finish specifications

  • Compliance with local building codes and standards

  • Budgetary constraints and project timelines

Standards and Principles

The project must adhere to the following standards and principles:

  • Design Standards: The design should reflect a modern aesthetic while incorporating elements of sustainability and functionality.

  • Sustainability: The project should meet green building standards, including energy efficiency and low environmental impact.

  • Accessibility: The design must ensure accessibility for all individuals, complying with ADA (Americans with Disabilities Act) standards.

  • Safety: All aspects of the design must adhere to safety regulations, including structural integrity and fire safety.

Weighting and Scoring

Criteria

Weight (%)

Score (1-10)

Design Innovation

25%

Compliance with Requirements

20%

Cost Efficiency

20%

Timeline Adherence

15%

Sustainability and Environmental Impact

20%

Notes:

  • Weight (%): Represents the importance of each criterion in the overall evaluation process. The total should equal 100%.

  • Score (1-10): This scale represents how well a proposal meets each criterion, with 10 being the highest score, indicating exceptional performance or compliance, and 1 being the lowest score, indicating poor performance or non-compliance.

  • Weighted Score: Calculated by multiplying the Weight (%) by the Score (1-10).

Evaluation Process

  1. Initial Review: Review of submitted proposals to ensure they meet the basic criteria.

  2. Detailed Evaluation: Assessment of design quality, functionality, and adherence to standards by the evaluation committee.

  3. Scoring: Application of the weighting system to rank proposals based on the established criteria.

  4. Feedback and Selection: Provision of feedback to designers, if applicable, and selection of the preferred design.

Criteria Templates @ Template.net