Architect Criteria

---

Introduction

This document provides the architectural criteria developed by [Your Company Name]. The purpose is to establish clear guidelines and standards to ensure the successful design and implementation of architectural projects.

Purpose

The purpose of this Architect Criteria is to:

• Outline the design and performance expectations for the project.

• Ensure the design meets the client’s needs and preferences.

• Maintain consistency with industry standards and regulatory requirements.

Scope

This criteria document covers:

• Design requirements and objectives

• Performance and functional standards

• Material and finish specifications

• Compliance with local building codes and standards

• Budgetary constraints and project timelines

Standards and Principles

The project must adhere to the following standards and principles:

• Design Standards: The design should reflect a modern aesthetic while incorporating elements of sustainability and functionality.

• Sustainability: The project should meet green building standards, including energy efficiency and low environmental impact.

• Accessibility: The design must ensure accessibility for all individuals, complying with ADA (Americans with Disabilities Act) standards.

• Safety: All aspects of the design must adhere to safety regulations, including structural integrity and fire safety.

Weighting and Scoring

Criteria	Weight (%)	Score (1-10)
Design Innovation	25%
Compliance with Requirements	20%
Cost Efficiency	20%
Timeline Adherence	15%
Sustainability and Environmental Impact	20%

Notes:

• Weight (%): Represents the importance of each criterion in the overall evaluation process. The total should equal 100%.

• Score (1-10): This scale represents how well a proposal meets each criterion, with 10 being the highest score, indicating exceptional performance or compliance, and 1 being the lowest score, indicating poor performance or non-compliance.

• Weighted Score: Calculated by multiplying the Weight (%) by the Score (1-10).

Evaluation Process

1. Initial Review: Review of submitted proposals to ensure they meet the basic criteria.

2. Detailed Evaluation: Assessment of design quality, functionality, and adherence to standards by the evaluation committee.

3. Scoring: Application of the weighting system to rank proposals based on the established criteria.

4. Feedback and Selection: Provision of feedback to designers, if applicable, and selection of the preferred design.

---

Criteria Templates @ Template.net