Construction Manager Criteria

---

Introduction

The Construction Manager Criteria document outlines the essential qualifications, skills, and responsibilities required for the Construction Manager role at [Your Company Name]. This document is designed to ensure that candidates or current managers meet the standards necessary for effective project management and successful execution of construction projects.

Purpose

The purpose of this criteria is to:

• Define the essential qualifications and skills required for the Construction Manager position.

• Provide a clear framework for evaluating candidates or assessing current managers.

• Ensure alignment with organizational goals and project requirements.

Scope

This criteria applies to:

• The recruitment and selection process for new Construction Managers at [Your Company Name].

• The performance evaluation and development of current Construction Managers.

• The establishment of training and development programs to enhance managerial capabilities.

Standards and Principles

The Construction Manager must adhere to the following standards and principles:

• Professionalism: Maintain a high standard of conduct and integrity.

• Compliance: Ensure all projects comply with relevant laws, regulations, and industry standards.

• Quality: Deliver projects that meet or exceed the specified quality standards.

• Safety: Prioritize and enforce safety measures and protocols on all projects.

Weighting and Scoring

Criterion	Description	Weight (%)	Score Range
Qualifications	Evaluation of educational background and certifications.	20%	1 to 5
Skills	Assessment of project management, communication, and technical skills.	25%	1 to 5
Responsibilities	Ability to effectively perform key job functions.	25%	1 to 5
Experience	Relevant experience in similar projects and roles.	20%	1 to 5
Competencies	Evaluation of personal attributes and soft skills.	10%	1 to 5

Scoring Scale:

• 1: Poor – Does not meet the criteria at all.

• 2: Fair – Meets some aspects of the criteria but with significant gaps.

• 3: Good – Meets most aspects of the criteria with minor gaps.

• 4: Very Good – Meets nearly all aspects of the criteria with minor exceptions.

• 5: Excellent – Fully meets all aspects of the criteria with no gaps.

Evaluation Process

1. Application Review: Evaluate resumes and cover letters to ensure candidates meet the minimum qualifications.

2. Interview: Conduct structured interviews to assess skills, experience, and alignment with organizational values.

3. Assessment: Use practical tests or scenarios to evaluate problem-solving and project management abilities.

4. Reference Check: Verify professional references to confirm past performance and suitability for the role.

5. Final Selection: Compile and review scores from all evaluation stages to make the final hiring decision.

Criteria Templates @ Template.net