Teacher Criteria

---

Prepared by: [Your Name]

Date: November 25, 2050

---

Introduction

This Teacher Evaluation Criteria document offers a structured framework to fairly and consistently assess educators, focusing on teaching quality, student engagement, and educational outcomes. It supports professional growth and recognizes teaching excellence.

Purpose

The purpose of this criteria is to support a high standard of teaching by identifying areas of strength and areas needing development for educators. By providing clear, weighted criteria, the document aids in fair, objective evaluations and informs targeted professional development.

Scope

This evaluation applies to all teaching staff for both formative and summative assessments, focusing on key competencies like instructional planning, student engagement, and professional development.

---

Criteria Table

Criteria	Short Description	Weight	Score (1-5)
1. Instructional Planning	The ability to design effective lesson plans that align with curriculum standards and meet diverse student needs.	20%
2. Classroom Management	Establishing and maintaining a productive classroom environment conducive to learning.	15%
3. Student Engagement	Using effective strategies to actively involve students in learning activities.	15%
4. Assessment and Feedback	Employing assessments to gauge student progress and provide constructive feedback for improvement.	15%
5. Professional Development	Commitment to ongoing learning and improving teaching practices through professional growth opportunities.	10%
6. Communication	Maintaining clear and effective communication with students, parents, and colleagues.	15%
7. Ethical and Professional Conduct	Adherence to professional standards, ethical behavior, and positive role modeling.	10%

---

Scoring System

• 5 – Outstanding: Surpasses expectations with exemplary skills.

• 4 – Very Good: Meets expectations and shows a strong competency in this area.

• 3 – Satisfactory: Meets basic expectations and performs adequately.

• 2 – Needs Improvement: Falls short of expectations; improvement is required.

• 1 – Unsatisfactory: Does not meet expectations; significant development is needed.

---

Evaluation Process

1. Self-Assessment: Teachers are encouraged to complete a self-assessment before their review.

2. Observation and Evidence Collection: Evaluators conduct observations and gather evidence of teaching practices through classroom visits, student work analysis, and feedback from students and parents.

3. Scoring and Feedback: Evaluators score each criterion and provide constructive feedback, highlighting strengths and areas for improvement.

4. Review and Discussion: The evaluator and teacher meet to discuss the results and collaboratively set goals for future development.

5. Professional Development Plan: Based on the evaluation, a targeted professional development plan is created to address identified growth areas.

---

Criteria Templates @ Template.net