Librarian Criteria

---

Prepared by: [Your Name]

Date: June 28, 2050

---

Introduction

The Librarian Criteria document establishes a comprehensive framework for evaluating the qualifications, skills, and performance of librarians within our institution. It serves as a guide for hiring, professional development, and performance appraisal, ensuring that all librarians meet the necessary standards to provide high-quality services to our community.

Purpose

The purpose of this document is to:

• Define the essential qualifications and competencies required for librarians.

• Provide a standardized method for assessing librarian candidates and current staff.

• Promote growth through transparent, objective evaluations.

• Ensure alignment with institutional goals and the needs of our patrons

Scope

This criteria document applies to all librarian positions within our organization, including but not limited to reference librarians, technical services librarians, digital services librarians, and library administrators. It is relevant for use during the recruitment process, annual performance reviews, and professional development planning.

Criteria Table

Criteria	Description	Weight (%)	Rating (1-5)
Educational Background	Minimum of a Master's degree in Library Science or related field.	20%
Professional Experience	Relevant experience in library services, including internships.	25%
Technical Skills	Proficiency in cataloging, database management, and digital resources.	15%
Customer Service Skills	Ability to assist and engage with library users effectively.	20%
Communication Skills	Strong written and verbal communication abilities.	10%
Professional Development	Commitment to ongoing learning and professional growth.	10%
Total Weight: 100%

Evaluation Process

1. Initial Screening: Candidates are reviewed based on education and experience. Minimum criteria must be met.

2. Technical Assessment: Practical tests or work samples demonstrate skills in cataloging and database management.

3. Interview: A panel evaluates customer service, communication skills, and fit through behavioral questions.

4. Scoring and Weighting: Criteria are rated from 1 to 5, multiplied by their weights, and summed for a total score.

5. Final Decision: The highest-scoring candidate is chosen, with references and background checks also considered.

6. Continuous Evaluation: Annual reviews for current employees focus on professional growth and performance.

Rating Scale

Rating	Description
1	Below Expectations
2	Needs Improvement
3	Meets Expectations
4	Exceeds Expectations
5	Outstanding

Note: The rating scale ranges from 1 (Below Expectations) to 5 (Outstanding). Each rating reflects the degree to which the candidate or employee meets the defined criteria.

---

Criteria Templates @ Template.net