Criteria

---

Prepared By: [YOUR NAME]

Date: January 1, 2050

---

Introduction

This document outlines the criteria for evaluating the Community Health Improvement Initiative. The purpose of these criteria is to ensure a systematic and objective assessment, facilitating informed decision-making and promoting transparency.

Purpose and Scope

The evaluation criteria aim to standardize the assessment of the Community Health Improvement Initiative, identify strengths and improvement areas, and ensure accountability and alignment with organizational goals. Applicable to all initiative aspects and stakeholders, evaluations will occur quarterly from January 1, 2050, to December 31, 2052.

Criteria Table

Criteria	Description	Weight (%)	Score (1-5)	Comments
Relevance	Alignment with organizational goals, including access to healthcare and reducing health disparities.	20%
Impact	Measurable outcomes, such as the number of community members served and improvements in health metrics.	25%
Feasibility	Practicality of implementation, considering resource availability, budget constraints, and community engagement.	20%
Sustainability	Long-term viability post-implementation, including ongoing funding and community support plans.	15%
Stakeholder Engagement	Involvement and satisfaction of key stakeholders, incorporating feedback from community members and partners.	10%
Innovation	Creativity in approach, including unique outreach and education strategies for diverse populations.	10%

Scoring System

Each criterion will be evaluated on a scale of 1 to 5, where:

• 1 = Poor: Criteria not met, significant issues present.

• 2 = Fair: Some criteria were met, and moderate issues were present.

• 3 = Good: Criteria were mostly met, and minor issues were present.

• 4 = Very Good: Criteria met with few or no issues.

• 5 = Excellent: Criteria fully met, exemplary performance.

Evaluation Process

1. Preparation: Define the evaluation team, gather relevant materials, and ensure all evaluators understand the criteria.

2. Data Collection: Collect data through surveys, interviews with community members and stakeholders, document reviews of progress reports, and site visits to program locations.

3. Scoring: Each evaluator scores the criteria based on evidence gathered during the data collection phase.

4. Consensus Meeting: Convene the evaluation team to discuss scores, ensure consistency, and address discrepancies.

5. Final Report: Compile scores, comments, and recommendations into a final report that summarizes findings and suggests next steps for improvement.

---

Criteria Templates @ Template.net