Professional Political Analyst Criteria

---

Prepared By: [YOUR NAME]

Date: January 31, 2050

---

Introduction

This document outlines the criteria for evaluating the qualifications and performance of a professional political analyst. It is designed to ensure that analysts meet a high standard of expertise, ethical conduct, and analytical skills.

Purpose

The purpose of this criteria is to establish a standardized method for assessing political analysts across various parameters. This will aid organizations and clients in identifying the most qualified professionals in the field of political analysis.

Scope

The criteria apply to all political analysts seeking to be recognized as professionals in their field. It covers a range of analytical, ethical, and professional capabilities required for success in political analysis.

Criteria Table

Criteria	Short Description	Weight (%)	Score (1-5)	Comments
Educational Background	Degree in Political Science, International Relations, or a related field.	15
Analytical Skills	Ability to analyze data, trends, and policies critically.	20
Research Experience	Demonstrated experience in conducting political research.	15
Communication Skills	Proficiency in written and verbal communication, including report writing and presentations.	20
Political Awareness	Understanding of political systems, current events, and global issues.	15
Interpersonal Skills	Ability to work collaboratively and engage with stakeholders effectively.	10
Technical Proficiency	Familiarity with analytical tools and software used in political analysis.	5

Scoring System

Each criterion will be scored on a scale of 1 to 5, with the following descriptions:

• 1: Poor – Does not meet the criteria.

• 2: Fair – Meets some aspects of the criteria but requires improvement.

• 3: Good – Meets the criteria adequately.

• 4: Very Good – Exceeds the criteria in most areas.

• 5: Excellent – Significantly exceeds the criteria and demonstrates exceptional capability.

Evaluation Process

1. Initial Screening: Review resumes and cover letters for minimum qualifications.

2. Interviews: Assess candidates using the criteria table.

3. Scoring: Assign scores for each criterion based on candidate responses.

4. Weighting: Multiply scores by their respective weights for a weighted score.

5. Final Evaluation: Sum the weighted scores to rank candidates.

6. Selection: Choose the top candidates based on overall scores.

---

Criteria Templates @ Template.net