Free Project Impact Assessment Template
Project Impact Assessment
Introduction
This Project Impact Assessment is designed to evaluate the outcomes, effectiveness, and sustainability of the project. By assessing the project based on various criteria, stakeholders can make informed decisions about its overall success and areas for improvement. The assessment will be completed using a scoring system and qualitative feedback.
General Information
Field |
Details |
---|---|
Project Name |
Community Green Initiative |
Assessment Date |
March 15, 2057 |
Assessor Name |
[YOUR NAME], [YOUR COMPANY NAME] |
Project Duration |
January 2055 - December 2056 |
Funding Agency (if any) |
Green Future Foundation |
Evaluation Criteria
Instructions
Rate each criterion on a scale from 1 (Poor) to 5 (Excellent). Provide comments to elaborate on the score where necessary.
Criteria |
Weight (%) |
Score (1-5) |
Weighted Score |
Comments |
---|---|---|---|---|
|
20% |
5 |
1.0 |
The project achieved all stated objectives, particularly in community education. |
|
15% |
4 |
0.6 |
Stakeholders expressed satisfaction, though some suggested broader outreach. |
|
15% |
5 |
0.75 |
Resources were optimally allocated, with minimal waste and maximum impact. |
|
20% |
4 |
0.8 |
Over 10,000 trees were planted, and 80% survival rate was recorded after a year. |
|
10% |
3 |
0.3 |
Concerns raised about maintenance funding beyond the initial implementation. |
|
10% |
4 |
0.4 |
Most risks were mitigated effectively, though weather-related risks persisted. |
|
10% |
5 |
0.5 |
Introduced a mobile app for community participation and monitoring progress. |
|
10% |
4 |
0.4 |
The project created a noticeable improvement in local air quality and engagement. |
Detailed Analysis and Feedback
1. Alignment with Objectives
The project exceeded expectations by engaging over 50% more participants than initially anticipated.
-
Comments: Exceptional alignment with goals; activities directly addressed objectives.
2. Stakeholder Satisfaction
Feedback highlighted satisfaction with execution but suggested more frequent updates on progress.
-
Comments: Consider adding quarterly stakeholder review meetings.
3. Resource Utilization
Budget reports show that 98% of allocated resources were effectively used, with no major overruns.
-
Comments: Excellent management of both financial and human resources.
4. Tangible Outcomes Achieved
The project planted 10,000 trees and initiated three community-driven green zones. Survival rates need consistent monitoring.
-
Comments: Tangible results, but room for improvement in long-term tracking.
5. Long-Term Sustainability
Limited provisions for ongoing maintenance may hinder long-term impact.
-
Comments: Suggest establishing a fund for sustainability activities.
6. Risk Management
Well-handled risks except for unavoidable weather conditions during initial stages.
-
Comments: Develop contingency plans for future climate disruptions.
7. Innovation and Creativity
The mobile app was highly praised, providing transparency and encouraging community engagement.
-
Comments: A unique and replicable approach to similar projects.
8. Community Impact (if applicable)
The project contributed to a 12% improvement in air quality and significantly raised environmental awareness.
-
Comments: Expand outreach to more urban areas for greater impact.
Summary of Scores
Total Weighted Score |
Performance Level |
---|---|
4.75 |
Outstanding |
Recommendations and Action Plan
-
Establish a dedicated sustainability fund to support long-term outcomes.
-
Expand outreach efforts to urban areas and adjacent communities.
-
Conduct annual evaluations to monitor tree survival and air quality improvements.
-
Incorporate more diverse stakeholder engagement methods.
Acknowledgment
By signing below, the assessor confirms that this evaluation has been conducted objectively and that the information provided is accurate to the best of their knowledge.
Assessor Signature: ________________________
Date: March 15, 2057