Project Objectives Gap Analysis

---

Prepared By: [YOUR NAME]
Date: July 1, 2050

---

I. Current State

The project's progress can be assessed by examining its current performance metrics, deliverables, and how satisfied stakeholders are; it currently fulfills about 70% of its goals, excelling in cost management and time scheduling but facing issues with quality management and scope adherence, with stakeholders moderately satisfied and suggesting improvements in communication and result sharing.

A. Current Performance Metrics

Objective	Status	Performance Indicator
Cost Efficiency	On Track	Within 5% of the Budget
Time Management	On Track	Completed 80% of Scheduled Milestones
Quality Management	Needs Improvement	30% of Deliverables Below Quality Standards
Scope Adherence	Needs Improvement	Frequent Scope Changes

---

II. Desired State

The desired state encompasses a comprehensive vision where the project consistently achieves its outlined goals with precision and efficiency. The aim is to bolster project outcomes by achieving 100% of the set objectives with enhanced quality and complete stakeholder satisfaction. This includes a firm adherence to the financial plan, timely completion of project phases, superior quality of outputs, and minimized deviation from the original scope.

Goals and Outcomes

• Financial Performance: Maintain costs within 2% of the allocated budget.

• Timeline: Completion of all milestones within the agreed schedule.

• Quality Standards: Achieve 95% quality compliance for all deliverables.

• Scope Management: Implement robust change control to minimize scope changes.

• Stakeholder Satisfaction: Elevate satisfaction levels to 90% through efficient communication and consistent updates.

---

III. Gap Identification

This section elucidates the discrepancies between the current state and the desired objectives. Key gaps identified include deficiencies in quality management, scope control, and stakeholder engagement.

A. Current vs. Desired Analysis

Aspect	Current State	Desired State	Gap
Quality Management	70% Compliance	95% Compliance	25% Deficit
Scope Control	Frequent Changes	Minimized Changes	Inconsistent Change Management
Stakeholder Engagement	Moderate Satisfaction	High Satisfaction	20% Satisfaction Gap

---

IV. Root Cause Analysis

The root causes for the identified gaps stem from a few critical issues. In quality management, there is inadequate quality assurance processes and oversight. For scope control, insufficient change management protocols lead to frequent deviations. Stakeholder engagement is hindered by irregular communication channels and a lack of proactive feedback mechanisms.

A. Root Causes

• Quality Management: The absence of rigorous quality control measures and the inadequacy of thorough internal auditing procedures.

• Scope Control: The absence of a clearly defined change management framework, coupled with insufficient documentation, can lead to challenges in effectively managing and implementing organizational changes.

• Stakeholder Engagement: There is a restricted or narrow range of feedback loops present, coupled with a delay in the communication regarding the progress being made.

---

V. Action Plan

A strategic plan has been devised to bridge the identified gaps. This includes targeted actions, assignment of responsibilities, and time-sensitive implementation schedules to streamline improvements.

Steps to Address Gaps

1. Quality Management Enhancement: Implement regular quality audits and establish a cross-functional quality assurance team. Responsible: Quality Control Manager. Timeline: Within 3 months.

2. Scope Control Strengthening: Develop and enforce a comprehensive change management protocol. Responsible: Project Manager. Timeline: Immediate, with full implementation within 6 weeks.

3. Enhanced Stakeholder Engagement: Structured feedback sessions and bi-weekly updates. Responsible: Communication Lead. Timeline: Start within 1 month.

---

Analysis Templates @ Template.net