Free Product Return Root Cause Analysis Template
Product Return Root Cause Analysis
Prepared By: [YOUR NAME]
Date: January 1, 2060
I. General Information
-
Product Name: Premium Wireless Headphones
-
SKU: WHP-X2050
-
Product Description: High-definition wireless headphones featuring noise cancellation, Bluetooth 5.0, and a 20-hour battery life.
-
Return Date: January 15, 2061
-
Return Location: MetroTech Electronics, Downtown Branch
II. Problem Description
-
Issue Reported: Customers have been reporting connectivity issues with the Bluetooth feature, particularly with devices running older operating systems. Some users have also complained about uncomfortable ear padding.
-
Frequency of Return: 12% of returned units over the past month have cited Bluetooth connectivity problems, while 8% mention discomfort in the ear padding.
-
Customer Feedback:
-
“Bluetooth drops out during use, especially when paired with my laptop.”
-
“The ear padding feels hard after extended use.”
-
III. Root Cause Investigation
-
Investigation Method Used:
-
5 Whys Analysis
-
Fishbone Diagram (Cause categories: Design, Manufacturing, User Error, External Factors)
-
-
Findings:
-
Root Cause 1 (Bluetooth Connectivity): The Bluetooth chip used in the model is incompatible with older versions of operating systems, causing connectivity drops.
-
Root Cause 2 (Ear Padding): The ear padding material used in the current design is rigid and not as breathable as previous models, leading to discomfort after prolonged use.
-
-
Additional Contributing Factors:
-
Design Oversight: Insufficient testing with older operating systems, particularly those used by a significant portion of the customer base.
-
Supply Chain Constraints: Limited availability of more comfortable ear padding materials during the product’s manufacturing run.
-
IV. Contributing Factors
-
Design Factors: The Bluetooth chip was selected based on current technology compatibility but was not fully tested across the range of operating systems in use by consumers.
-
Manufacturing Factors: The ear padding was chosen based on cost and availability, but alternative, softer, and more breathable materials were not considered due to supply chain delays.
-
External Factors: Environmental testing for comfort and performance was not conducted in warmer climates, which could exacerbate ear padding discomfort.
-
Process Factors: A limited number of focus groups used early prototypes, which did not represent a broad enough demographic to highlight these issues.
V. Corrective Actions
-
Action 1: Bluetooth Connectivity Fix
-
Solution: Switch to a more universally compatible Bluetooth chip (Bluetooth 5.1 or higher), ensuring compatibility with older operating systems and conducting thorough cross-platform testing.
-
Implementation Date: March 1, 2061
-
Responsible Parties: Product Design Team, Engineering Team
-
-
Action 2: Ear Padding Redesign
-
Solution: Use a softer, breathable material for the ear padding, sourced from an alternative supplier, and increase padding thickness for added comfort.
-
Implementation Date: April 15, 2061
-
Responsible Parties: Product Design Team, Supply Chain Manager
-
-
Action 3: Improved Testing Procedures
-
Solution: Implement additional testing procedures, including multi-platform Bluetooth testing and ergonomic trials, particularly in varied climate conditions.
-
Implementation Date: January 30, 2061
-
Responsible Parties: Quality Assurance Team, Testing Department
-
VI. Verification and Follow-Up
-
Verification of Corrective Actions:
-
Bluetooth Fix: Test at least 500 units with varying operating systems to ensure no issues with connectivity.
-
Ear Padding Redesign: Conduct ergonomic tests with 100 participants, covering a variety of climates and usage scenarios.
-
-
Follow-Up Actions:
-
Recheck Product Returns: Monitor returns and customer feedback for six months after the new product release.
-
Customer Satisfaction Survey: Send out post-purchase surveys to customers, asking for detailed feedback on Bluetooth performance and ear comfort.
-
-
Follow-Up Date: October 15, 2061