Finance Budgeting Rubric
Finance Budgeting Rubric
This Finance Budgeting Rubric serves as a tool for evaluating our financial planning process. It assesses accuracy, completeness, and alignment with goals, aiming to enhance transparency and guide continuous improvement in our budgeting practices.
Accuracy of Financial Projections
How closely the projected figures align with actual performance.
|
Scoring |
|||
|
1 (Poor) |
2 (Fair) |
3 (Good) |
5 (Excellent) |
|
>15% variance |
10-15% variance |
5-10% variance |
<5% variance |
Completeness of Budgetary Components
Inclusion of all relevant income and expenditure categories.
|
Scoring |
|||
|
1 (Poor) |
2 (Fair) |
3 (Good) |
5 (Excellent) |
|
Missing more than 3 key components |
Missing 2-3 key components |
Missing 1 key component |
All components included |
Strategic Alignment
Alignment of budget with company's strategic goals.
|
Scoring |
|||
|
1 (Poor) |
2 (Fair) |
3 (Good) |
5 (Excellent) |
|
No clear alignment |
Partial alignment |
Mostly aligned |
Fully aligned |
Flexibility and Adaptability
Ability to adjust budget in response to changing circumstances.
|
Scoring |
|||
|
1 (Poor) |
2 (Fair) |
3 (Good) |
5 (Excellent) |
|
No flexibility; rigid structure |
Limited flexibility |
Moderately flexible |
Highly flexible and adaptable |
Stakeholder Involvement and Communication
Involvement and effective communication with relevant stakeholders.
|
Scoring |
|||
|
1 (Poor) |
2 (Fair) |
3 (Good) |
5 (Excellent) |
|
Minimal or no stakeholder involvement |
Some involvement; communication gaps exist |
Adequate involvement and communication |
High level of involvement; clear and continuous communication |
The assessment of our finance budgeting process highlights commendable strengths in realistic projections, comprehensive coverage, and effective monitoring mechanisms.
